68700 stories
·
3 followers

Who Is Rob Tracinski?

1 Share

It’s a heck of thing to see your name on the front page of the local paper. This is last Saturday’s Charlottesville Daily Progress, and it’s a profile of your truly, under the title “Who Is Rob Tracinski?”

Well, if you live in Charlottesville, and you didn’t know the answer to that question, there’s a better chance you know it now.

This profile is actually pretty good—with one big reservation—and I’d like to offer a few comments.

Sign up to learn more and to find out what you can do to help me restore the American system.

To begin with, they say it’s good publicity if they spell your name right, and that’s not something I can always take for granted, so I’m pretty happy with that. And it’s even better publicity if they mention my book, which they do. The very first step of my campaign is just name recognition—especially this early in the process. So this is exactly what the campaign needed right now.

And look, my advantage as a candidate is thirty years as a writer and speaker. I’m good at just sitting down and talking to a reporter.

And that’s the best thing about this profile. The reporter, David Valazquez, uses a lot of my best lines. So you get me saying, “I think the U.S. Congress is a good idea, and it would be nice if we had one.” Here’s an important one: “Part of the reason I ran is I didn’t see anybody else who was prepared for the kind of constitutional knife fight Congress needs to be fighting right now.” I describe our fifth district incumbent, John McGuire, as a “rubber stamp” without “even the slightest glimmer of independence,” and boy is that true.

And it quotes my basic case for my campaign: I can offer “a reasonable alternative for disgruntled independents and Republicans, while still offering Democrats the thing I think is actually most important, which is: We’re going to restore the power of Congress; we’re going to rein in an out-of-control president.”

But I’m afraid that led to a misunderstanding. I’ve done a lot of interviews, from both sides—asking the questions and being the guy who answers the question. And you never know what’s going to be misinterpreted. So I mentioned, just as a historical example, a previous Democratic representative from this district, Virgil Goode—as an example of how partisan loyalties sometimes shift. There are people who thought they could never vote for a Republican who know think they could never vote for a Democrat, and maybe they can switch back again. But then I find the reporter describing me as an “admirer” of Virgil Goode who takes him as my “role model.”

I never said any of that, and I didn’t mean to imply it, and I guess my lesson from this is to never mention the name Virgil Goode ever again. Because the downside is that Goode was elected as a Democrat and after a couple of terms ratted out on the Dems and switched to be a Republican, and I don’t want anyone thinking this is what I’m going to do.

The Republican Party is dead to me now, and even if they did their best to reform themselves and try to become something reasonable—well, you tell me how likely that is. You can’t turn back the clock, and we’re not gonna get, I don’t know, Ronald Reagan’s party back again. We’ve got the party that likes colonels from the KGB, not the one that hated them. It’s a shame, but there it is.

Last of all, the framing of this profile in the Daily Progress is that I’m the upstart candidate compared to the Tom Perriello, who I guess is more of the establishment Democrat in this district, and his one term in Congress sixteen years ago is the best Democrats have done so far this century. So fair enough, I know I’m the scrappy underdog in the Democratic primary.

But the first step is just to be getting better known to the community—and getting on the front page of the local paper, well, that’s a pretty good beginning.

The important thing is that this gets across my message about restoring our constitutional system, because that’s why I’m running, and it’s what I’m asking you to vote for.


Please consider a donation to support my campaign.

Donate with ActBlue

Save the credit card processing fees and mail a check to Tracinski for Congress, PO Box 6997, Charlottesville, VA 22906.

Donors must be US citizens and spending their own money. Campaign finance laws limit donations to $3500 per person per election.





Download audio: https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/185261054/2c6239daf53514c33817f6c8b41a0b3d.mp3
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
26 minutes ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Celebrities Can’t Stop Lying About Renee Good

1 Share

Celebrities have a fast and loose connection with the truth.

Look no further than late-night TV. Host after host bends reality to their whim, from promoting the Russian collusion hoax to denying that violent groups like Antifa exist.

That disconnect applies to the biggest issues of our age, like the war against ICE.

YouTube Video

The recent death of far-Left activist Renee Good, who prevented ICE agents from detaining hardened criminals in Minneapolis, is a prime example.

Multiple camera angles showed that Good not only refused direct orders from ICE officials but steered her car into the path of an agent, revved the engine and literally hit him with her Honda Pilot.

Said agent fired his weapon in self-defense, killing her. It’s a tragic death, no matter where one stands on ICE’s activities. It’s also not considered “murder” by sane observers, at least based on the available video evidence.

The agent suffered internal bleeding from being hit by the car, according to government officials.

Tell that to music superstar Bruce Springsteen. The Boss, depicted in 2025’s box office disappointment “Springsteen: Deliver Me from Nowhere,” raged against ICE in a factually-challenged tirade during a recent concert.

“If you believe in democracy, in liberty, if you believe that truth still matters, that it’s worth speaking out, that it is worth fighting for, if you believe in the power of the law and no one stands above it, if you stand against heavily armed masked federal troops invading American cities and using Gestapo tactics against our fellow citizens, if you believe you don’t deserve to be murdered for exercising your American right to protest, then send a message to this president,” Springsteen told the crowd, according to NJArts.net.

Quoting Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, he added, “and as the mayor of that city has said, ‘ICE should get the f— out of Minneapolis.'”

Good wasn’t protesting. She interrupted an ICE investigation, using her car to block official business. That isn’t a protest. Her death doesn’t change the facts in play.

And, of course, she wasn’t murdered. Springsteen doesn’t care enough to get the facts straight, and he’s only inflaming the situation. Does he want more Renee Goods?

Some Boss. But he’s not alone.

RELATED: SPRINGSTEEN ABANDONS HIS BLUE-COLLAR BASE

Far-Left singer Billie Eilish weighed in, too, pushing the same discredited talking points in the process. She did so while picking up an award for her environmental activism.

“We’re seeing our neighbors being kidnapped, peaceful protesters being assaulted and murdered, our civil rights being stripped,” she said. “Resources to fight the climate crisis being cut, fossil fuels and animal agriculture destroying our planet and people’s health, access to food and health care becoming a privilege for the wealthy, instead of a basic human right for all Americans.”

“It is very clear that protecting our planet and our communities are not a priority for this administration,” Eilish continued. “And it’s really hard to celebrate that when we no longer feel safe in our own homes or in our streets.”

More lies.

Ellen DeGeneres, who allegedly left the United States due to President Donald Trump, also lashed out in a similar manner.

“I just wanted to say I am so sorry for what is happening in Minneapolis and our country, really, but specifically Minneapolis right now,” DeGeneres began in her video. “Because it’s where I shot my last stand-up special, and everybody there couldn’t have been more lovely.”

“I shot it there because they say it’s the happiest city in America. And I found that to be true,” the comedian added. “So my thoughts and my prayers are going out to everyone. And I’m proud of everyone who’s protesting peacefully, and I am sorry for anyone who has been hurt just for protesting, for doing what you should be doing.”

These aren’t the only celebrities peddling similar fiction. It’s standard practice following Good’s death, including virtue signal buttons worn during the recent Golden Globes telecast.

Meanwhile, the same stars haven’t said “boo” about radical protesters breaking into a Minneapolis church, frightening citizens, while their peers harass anyone presumed to be pro-ICE.

Nor will they.

Celebrities can and often do help the country at large. They rally to raise funds for worthy causes. Some use their personal tragedies to help others, like Michael J. Fox’s work fighting Parkinson’s disease.

Too often, artists cling to their ideological handcuffs to spread lies and make matters worse for the country at large. And no Legacy Media outlet will dare question them, let alone call them out.

Editor’s Note: It’s a brutal time to be an independent journalist, but it’s never been more necessary given the sorry state of the corporate press. If you’re enjoying Hollywood in Toto, I hope you’ll consider leaving a coin (or two) in our Tip Jar.

The post Celebrities Can’t Stop Lying About Renee Good appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
28 minutes ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

The Left Rages Against Lone Conservative Theatre Group

1 Share

The Trump Kennedy Center suffered yet another cancellation this week.

The Martha Graham Dance Company bowed out due to President Donald Trump’s connection to the august institution. More cancellations will likely follow.

So it’s little surprise that Stage Right Theatrics endures a steady stream of attacks for merely … existing.

The Ohio-based company has done more than exist, though. The cultural institution celebrates its 10th festival this month, once more giving audiences a different perspective on the arts.

Yes, the shows offer a right-leaning look at the culture. One example? The company presented the world premiere of conservative author Andrew Klavan’s play, “The Uncanny,” four years ago.

The company’s anniversary festival of short plays kicks off Jan. 30 and runs through Feb. 1 at the Abbey Theatre of Dublin. The plays will be presented both in-person and live-streamed.

The short plays in question:

  • “All Packed” by Curtis Miller (CA), directed by Veronica Heer: A couple comes to grips with a coming pandemic while the audience benefits from a five-year headstart.
  • “(Not the) Metamorphosis” by Mary Poindexter McLaughlin (FL), directed by AJ Howell: Based on a 1920s “New York Times” article about the first woman to undergo plastic surgery, the play is inspired by Franz Kafka’s classic story.
  • “The One” by Stuart Brown (CT), directed by Stacy Zuberi: In the not-too-distant future, A.I. has taken over the educational system of the country. Adrian and Maddie fret about what this is doing to their son.
  • “Safe Space” by Matthew Greene (TN), directed by Alyssa Ryan: A college professor and HR go head-to-head in a space deemed safe from unwanted thoughts or ideas.

Company founder Robert Cooperman isn’t a radical right-winger. The Stage Right Theatrics motto remains, “Disagreement Does Not Equal Hate.®”

Tell that to Facebook users. They recoiled at a local news story tied to the group’s 10th anniversary. Here’s just a sampling of the responses.

I can see it now. Taking place 1942 Germany from the PATRIOTIC soldier’s perspective:
“Finding Anne Frank”

Stage Right presents “Ragtime” (but only the white scenes)!

“Springtime for Trump” – IYKYK

The possibilities are endless… They could do a version of Rent from the virus’ perspective

They have two drinking fountains and two sets of bathrooms

Be sure to visit the Epstein Lounge for a refreshment before the performance of Mein Kampf: The Musical.

D.W. Griffith’s ‘The Birth of a Nation’ will be playing daily…

The comments say far more about the people sharing them, from their lack of openness to hating anything that doesn’t perfectly align with their far-Left world view.

It’s the opposite of liberal. And these aren’t just words, according to Cooperman.

“For 10 years, we have more or less been boycotted by the local theater community.”

When a recent show paid tribute to the late Charlie Kirk, the response was immediate. Cancellations. Cries of bigotry. and more.

More information on Stage Right Theatrics 2026 festival:

Tickets cost $20 per person (for in-person) or per device (for live stream) and are available HERE. Senior (60+), student, first responder, and veteran discounts available ($5 off, making each discounted ticket $15). Call 614-562-9105 for the discount codes.

The festival is teaming with the Dublin Food Pantry to feed hungry citizens in the greater Columbus, Ohio region. Those donating to the cause will receive half-price tickets.

The post The Left Rages Against Lone Conservative Theatre Group appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
28 minutes ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Ayn Rand Was Not a Woke Leftist

1 Share

I remain a tremendous fan of Ayn Rand (Atlas Shrugged, Anthem, The Fountainhead, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal), who contributed enormously to my comprehension of psychology, philosophy, human nature, ethics and government. The people writing in her name today, without any authorization by her since she died over 40 years ago, are peddling as original the precise propaganda you can find on MSNBC or in The New York Times. This post will be of interest to those who follow such topics.

The following is a post by Char Cushman to which I say, Bravo!

For those of you who have read Harry Binswanger’s latest post about ICE. I 100% disagree with him. He completely ignores the entire context.
Culture matters.

Binswanger [of the Ayn Rand Institute] claims we are all tribalists who dislike immigrants because of their color. I wonder what he thinks about Ayn Rand when she called people in the middle east savages.

He defends the rule of law–the aliens broke immigration law. What about that law? Without vetting, immigrants entered here who have harmed American citizens. They have brutally murdered people, raped and murdered women, and have committed massive theft (the Day care fraud and other fraud) from us. And don’t forget that many of them hate our country and wish for our demise i.e. “death to America.” I have heard some say, well, we have criminals too. So? Our criminals should go to jail and criminal immigrants should be deported. Let’s say the rape and murder of Laken Riley was the only crime committed. It was one death too many. It would have never happened if we had protected borders. Tell Laken Riley’s parents, family and close friends that her death by an illegal alien doesn’t matter because we already have criminals here.

The Left is focusing on the rights of the immigrants. Those who commit crimes have given up their rights. Besides, what about our rights? We don’t have any? We work and pay the taxes, but we don’t get a say on who can come here?

There is NO RIGHT to go where ever you want to in the world. To say it is a right means that others have to provide you entrance no matter where you go, no matter who you are. Criminals do not have a right to go where ever they want. That is one reason why borders need to be protected so that the good immigrants can be distinguished from the bad.

Another crucial point is that we are now a welfare state which was not the case in the early years of our country. How many people can we support on welfare before the United States collapses?

Don’t listen to ARI (Ayn Rand Institute). They are traitors to our country.

… I would add to this that the protestors are not peaceful. Blocking traffic, spitting on officers, throwing bricks at them, surrounding their cars, breaking their windows, breaking into their cars, and stealing items such as guns from police cars is not peaceful. Plus, there is evidence that they are paid to protest. My only complaint about them is that they are being too soft. From the get go, they should have been arresting them and putting them in jail or spraying them with pepper spray or cold water.

 

By all means, read and discover the ideas and contributions of Ayn Rand. As for the people peddling leftism and subjectivism at ARI, run for your life.

As a reader commented on Facebook, “I’m totally flabbergasted at the turn ARI has taken in the last ten years — maybe longer, but I didn’t notice it until the 2016 election cycle, when they went off the rails.”

My reply: When you think about it, the people at ARI are making a career living off the work of another person, i.e., Ayn Rand. They’re the very kind of people she wrote about as the mediocrities in her novels. From what I can see, the leadership there hasn’t changed for two decades or more. It seems like this would have to be a symptom of something. The great thing about Ayn Rand’s ideas is that they will matter, and they will always matter somewhere, to somebody; ARI will be forgotten when it eventually runs out of other people’s money.

 

 

Follow Dr. Hurd on Facebook. Search under “Michael Hurd” (Charleston SC). Get up-to-the-minute postings, recommended articles and links, and engage in back-and-forth discussion with Dr. Hurd on topics of interest. Also follow Dr. Hurd on X at @MichaelJHurd1, drmichaelhurd on Instagram, @DrHurd on TruthSocial. Dr. Hurd is also now a Newsmax Insider!

The post Ayn Rand Was Not a Woke Leftist appeared first on Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D. | Living Resources Center.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Journalists Cover (for) Iran Betrayal

1 Share
A Vox piece carried by Yahoo! News promises speculation on "four possible reasons" for Trump's waffling on his threat to attack Iran if the Ayatollahs killed any protesters.

The Iranian regime has admitted murdering thousands since then, blaming the "deaths" on the United States and Israel.

Donald Trump's response?

So far, I hear crickets, and the barbaric clerics remain in power.

As I imagine many would do upon seeing such a headline, and hoping there could be legitimate reasons for a delay, I read the piece. Its four reasons are weak sauce, and sound like the usual left-wing excuses to tolerate hostile regimes.

Worse, the results of decades of bad American foreign policy will make these excuses sound more credible than they should, even to people who realize that American foreign policy should be one of self-interest.

The "reasons," as summarized by section headings are below, followed by my brief comments:
  • Will the US lose credibility? -- Our leaders have a long history of laying out "red lines" and then either still doing nothing, or not doing enough. Trump doing nothing will certainly damage what little credibility we have left. This regime is so evil that its downfall alone would be an enormous net benefit. It's hard to imagine how Trump doing enough to make this happen could hurt American self-interest, especially if he also unleashes Israel, which he should have done after we hit Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities.
  • Will it create new problems? -- This drops the entire context of the decades of worldwide problems the current regime has already caused and will definitely try to cause in the future, if it is left in place.
  • Would it accomplish anything? -- As opposed to not acting? Given America's decades of appeasement and half-measures, it's an understandable question, but it's not the right one.
  • Will it create false hope? -- If the last question was wrong, this one is obscene. Trump promising aid, and then reneging is what would have created false hope, and led to thousands of people -- who might have waited for more promising circumstances before acting -- to put their lives on the line prematurely. I am dubious about how well-thought-out an Iranian rebellion has been or could be, but it should say something that the people are out there facing bullets.
The piece ends as follows:
This story is still far from over, and intervention is still very much on the table, but the people of Iran would hardly be the first to rise up against an autocratic government with America’s encouragement, only to find that there are limits to how far the US was actually willing to go to support them.
I doubt that anyone expects the United States to do everything for them, and this is true, as far as it goes, but it would be fair to condemn our previous administrations for paying lip service to freedom, without backing those words up meaningfully.

This regime is weak, and it would be short work for us to destroy enough of its military and state police capacity to topple it. That would be in our interest, and it would have been fine for Trump to have communicated such an offer with limits, rather than grandstanding, as I am afraid he has done.

-- CAV
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Something Happened

1 Share

*What follows are a few observations and thoughts from a trip I took last week to give a talk at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas. I started writing as events were unfolding in real time.

**The audio version is at the end for paid subscribers.

Share

Thursday, January 15, 2026:

I’m writing this essay at 36,000 feet on a flight from Atlanta to Kansas City. I had no intention of writing this essay when I boarded the plane, but sometimes life happens.

Something happened to me today that has both shaken me to the core and left me thinking about the nature of joy and suffering. I have nothing profound or important to say other than to share my experience with you and a few thoughts to go with it.

At the Atlanta airport this morning, I watched a middle-aged mother and father board our plane to Kansas City with their severely disabled son. As it was, father, son, and mother sat in the row directly right in front of me. The parents were in their mid-fifties and the son seemed to be in his mid-twenties. As far as I could tell, the son was a quadriplegic, non-verbal, and breathed through oxygen tubes. The mother sat by the window, the father in the aisle seat, and the son in the middle. I was sitting in the aisle seat behind them, so I could partially see the young man through the gap between his seat and his father’s.

Just after we took off, the son’s assisted breathing, which was clearly audible to me, became fast, heavy, and hard. During a moment of particularly turbulent breathing, I saw the mother reach for her son’s hand, and almost immediately his breathing slowed and softened. A simple touch of a mother’s hand lowered the son’s anxiety. Occasionally, the father would take a cloth and gently wipe his son’s brow, which was glistening with perspiration undoubtedly because of the heat generated by his heavy breathing. It seemed as though the son was using all his energy and strength just to breath.

I will admit to you that I was pained—deeply—by the whole scene. Never in my life have I witnessed a scene so tender, loving, and tragic. My sense of the son’s condition is that it was not the result of accident but was congenital. I suspect he has cerebral palsy.

My first thought was that what I had just witnessed as we were boarding and as I was now experiencing on the plane was part of a process that had begun hours earlier in the darkness of the early morning when this family awoke to begin their day’s journey. I imagined what it would have taken for these parents to gently pull their son out of his bed, dress and feed him, put him in their vehicle, drive to the airport, get him to the terminal and through security, get on the plane, fly for two-and-a-half hours constantly caring for his wellbeing, get off the plane, and then reverse the whole process for the rest of the day. Just one day in their lives would exhaust anyone.

It then occurred to me that these two loving parents had done some variation of what they were doing today every single day for the last 25 years or so. In other words, the parents had done some version of today for approximately the last 9,125 days. All this struck me like a thunderbolt. Frankly, the moment was emotionally overwhelming.

I then asked of myself the obvious question: could I do what these parents are doing? Could I do what they have done for 25 years. Could I do what they have done and are now doing for the rest of my life as they will be doing for the rest of their lives? Could I love and care for a child and then an adult child incapable of caring for him- or herself? It would surely mean that all that I have done in my life and loved doing, I almost certainly would not and could not have done. My life would have been radically different. My wife and I would have had to spend every single day of our lives thinking and worrying about and caring for our helpless child. Would my marriage have survived? God forbid, would I have abandoned my child to institutional care as have many parents?

After thinking through what it would mean to have a child with a severe disability, I recalled that moment when each my three (now adult) children were born. I don’t mean to speak for all fathers, but I suspect many have done some version of what I did. Each time a nurse put one of those helpless babies in my arms, I welled up with emotion, my eyes filling with tears, and I whispered to each one my children these words: “I will love you, and I will care for you, and I will protect you every day for the rest of my life.” And when I said it, I meant it. I meant it more than anything I had ever said in my life before. Other than my wedding vows, never have I said words that I meant with such ferocious intensity and commitment. I meant those words so much that they hurt—hard. In each of those three successive moments, I became a different person. Something about me was different and better than before. And now, 30, 28, and 26 years later, I can still feel the remnants of an emotion that will never leave me.

In those three moments and with those simple words, I experienced the obvious emotion of life-altering joy. The joy I felt each time was that all-too-human joy knowing that my wife and I had created new life, that my wife (the one who had once thought she might not want to have children) had carried and brought into the world three beautiful babies. Like all parents, I felt the earth-shattering joy that I was holding in my arms each time the most beautiful thing I had ever seen. I felt the joy that I was now a father. I felt the joy that we would now be a family. I felt the joy that we would live and love together for the rest of our lives. Nothing in my life has or ever will be better than the three times I held those babies in my arms for the first time.

But I must also tell you that in that in each of those life-altering moments, I also experienced two other emotions very different from joy: anger and fear.

I felt anger because in an instant, when I made that pledge to each of my babies, I knew that my life would never be the same again. I knew that I had taken on a new role in life. As a father, I was now a protector and everything that entails. I knew that from that point forward my only real job in life was to protect my wife and children. But to be a protector assumes that there are forces in the world from which your children must be protected. As I write these words, I am reminded of that line from Cormack McCarthy’s novel The Road, when the father says to his son (which I paraphrase from memory), “if they touch you, I’ll kill them, because that’s my job.” When I first held each of my children in my arms, I didn’t say exactly those words to them or to myself, but they do express near perfectly what I felt in those three moments, and what I still feel today. (And I’m blessed now to feel the very same thing about my grandchildren.)

Make no mistake about it: that is my job—to protect and care for my children. No human law could stop me from doing whatever it took to keep them safe. I knew that instantaneously when I held each of my babies for the first time. There is something deeply primal that happens when a young man becomes a father (something that is and must be otherwise buried deep in one’s consciousness because of its ferocity), and I’m sure something similarly primal happens (but perhaps in a different way) to a young woman when she becomes a mother. I will also tell you that in that moment when I said those words to each of my babies and then in a millisecond experienced first joy and then anger, I felt something that scared me—something so powerful knowing I could live out McCarthy’s words (without hesitation or remorse) in order to protect my children.

But in each of the three most important moments of my life, I also felt a third emotion: a tinge of fear. The fear that any one of my children could suffer some unexpected malady beyond my ability to protect them that would change the course of their lives and mine. The ominous threat of a life-altering illness or accident is always lurking in the back of a parent’s mind. We fear the hand of fortune and tragedy. Suffering does not define the human condition, but we all know that fortune is a harsh mistress whose presence lurks in the dark corners of life. It’s an omnipresent force that we can never entirely shake. We all know that we will all, at some point in our lives, suffer the loss of loved ones. We can’t escape the pain and suffering that inevitably defines the human condition.

But for the grace of God (idiomatically speaking), I have not faced such tragedy, but I know the possibility is always there. In many ways, the emotion of fear is much more present in a parent’s life. Life is full of unexpected tragedy, and parents live in quiet fear for their children and for themselves. Tragedy is not man’s natural condition, but the possibility is always there, and parents fear it. Our radar is always on high alert with our children, particularly when they are young. We fear a toddler walking onto a busy street, we fear the sixteen-year-old who goes out at night with a car, and we fear the possibility of a child being diagnosed with cancer or some other life-threatening disease.

So, could I be as brave and loving as the two parents sitting in the row in front me?

I don’t know. I’d like to think so. To these two parents whom I don’t know and their son, I say thank you. Thank you for reminding me of the words I whispered to my children on the days they were born. Thank you for filling my eyes today with the same tears of joy, anger, and fear.

Sometimes it’s good to feel alive.

Subscribe now

*** Addendum.

Friday, January 16:

There is a sad addendum to my travels.

On my way home from Kansas, I had a two-hour layover in Atlanta. Sitting directly across from me was a slightly younger family than I had seen the day before: a mother and father in their late thirties, and what looked to be a ten-year-old girl in a wheelchair. The girl seemed to have little control of her arms and legs, and her fingers and wrists were curled and bent toward her forearms. The girl, who didn’t seem to have full control of her neck muscles either, would sit up for a few minutes and then slump over at the waist and her head would fall almost into her lap. She had the body control of a rag doll. The sitting up and then slumping over went on for almost an hour.

During that entire time, her parents, who were sitting to one side of her, said nothing to their daughter; indeed, they didn’t even bother look at her—not once! Instead, their own heads were bowed as they doom scrolled on their phones. Their daughter might as well have been sitting by herself without her parents, without anyone, lost in a sea of strangers. In that moment, I saw a girl with no one to love, care, or protect her. My anger mounted, but I felt helpless to do anything with her parents sitting right there. Eventually, an older woman, probably a grandmother, sat down beside the girl and gently put her granddaughters head on her shoulder to rest. And still the parents do nothing! At that moment, I felt nothing but an overwhelming sadness for this girl and total contempt for her parents.

As if her afflictions weren’t enough, this young girl seemingly does not have parents who love her enough to shoulder her suffering.

Sometimes it feels rotten to be alive!

***Second Addendum:

My last flight was moved to a different gate. I made my way to a new seat. I sat down beside a young man, probably in his late twenties. A few minutes later his equally young wife approached and dropped a beautiful baby boy on dad’s lap. This little baby boy squealed with delight. Dad immediately started bouncing his son on his thighs and Eskimo kissing this little baby boy. This is life as it should be.

Let us all “suffer the little children” to come into our lives with a love that is at once tender and ferocious.

Our children—all children—must know that life is beautiful. They deserve nothing less.

Have a great week!

Share

The Redneck Intellectual is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

The audio recording below the paywall is for paid subscribers only.

Read more

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories