71524 stories
·
2 followers

Clarence Thomas Played the Long Game. He Won.

1 Share


Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
10 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Norway Shrugged

1 Share
Comments
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
10 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

"Leisure, far from being laziness, is often the most active and engaged part of our lives."

1 Share
"The ancient Greeks’ word for work simply translates as “not leisure”. ... for the Greeks, only has meaning in relation to leisure. There is no way to make sense of labour without rest. This is because work, for the Greeks, has leisure as its purpose. Doing work without the promise of leisure is simply running around in circles with no end in mind—it’s incomprehensible.

"If leisure is not just laziness, what is it? [German philosopher Josef] Pieper defines leisure as the things that we do for their own sake. We don’t need a reason to sit on the porch on a warm morning and appreciate the sunrise. We don’t need a reason to spend time with friends and family. These things are simply worthwhile for their own sake.

"Leisure, far from being laziness, is often the most active and engaged part of our lives. Things like working for our communities or engaging in personal projects are often the places where we are most active. Leisure doesn’t mean doing nothing—it just means doing something for no particular reward.

"We might think of work and leisure as opposites. However, complements seems to be a better term. These are not opposed ideas. Instead, each perfects the other. When we understand the value of leisure and what things are really worthwhile for their own sake, we can finally understand what it is that makes work worthwhile."

~ Patrick Cavanaugh Koroly from his post 'What is True Leisure? How does work find its meaning in leisure?'
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
10 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Ammous Debunking the “AI Can Solve the Socialist Calculation Problem” Nonsense

1 Share

Related

Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins (quoting Martin Sandbu, “Could AI Revive the Socialist Dream?,” Financial Times, August 28, 2026): 
FT: “Imagine a super-AI armed with access to all the data we let our devices record for every transaction we enter into….Such an AI would surely bury Hayek… it shows that AI removes one of the 20th century’s strongest arguments against central planning.”

Ammous:

No, it can’t. The problem of socialist calculation is the absence of property rights, as Mises explained, not knowledge, as Hayek put it. Without property rights, there is no possibility of calculating profit/loss with real opportunity costs for an actual owner who reaps the benefits of correct plans and suffers the consequences of wrong plans. Hayek’s fluffy talk about knowledge is nice and catchy, but ultimately unrigorous, imprecise, and confusing. No matter how much knowledge you give to a computer, it cannot perform economic calculation on capital that is not owned, whose loss doesn’t cost anyone anything and whose success doesn’t provide profits to anyone. Socialists have been getting overexcited about every single advance in computer technology for a century, thinking it will finally provide them the tools to defeat Hayek, but the only thing that ever worked for them is private property, in other words, moving away from socialism. The only way to make socialism work is to kneel before Mises and allow property rights and let property owners perform economic socialism. In other words, the only way to make socialism work is to stop it from being socialist. The issue is not about the size of knowledge. This is why Amazon can successfully plan for hundreds of millions of workers, suppliers, and customers, but socialism fails in a tiny country like Estonia. Amazon, and everyone involved with it, have property rights and can perform economic calculation. A minister in socialist tiny Estonia has no property rights and so cannot perform economic calculation. Hayek may be nice to read in the early phase of your learning economics and recovering from Marxist, Keynesian, and Friedmanite nonsense, but he is no substitute for the real deal: Mises, Rothbard, and Hoppe. I discuss this in detail in my Principles of Economics, and you can see the full lecture based on the chapter on —

 

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
20 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Mamdani's Universal Child Care Extension Turns Into 'an Absolute Disaster'

1 Share


Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
1 day ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Tucker Carlson Spends 380th Consecutive Episode Criticizing Country Nobody Is Allowed To Criticize

1 Share

U.S. — Former Fox News host turned podcaster Tucker Carlson released a groundbreaking 380th consecutive episode criticizing the one country that Carlson says no one is allowed to criticize.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
1 day ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories