71199 stories
·
2 followers

Online ad giant Adform was hacked, proving once again why ad blockers are needed

1 Share
Comments
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Mamdani’s Plan to Cut City Spending: Ask Workers Nicely

1 Share
Voluntary budget cuts won’t be enough. The mayor will have to impose real fiscal discipline.
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

SCIENCE: Penn professor claims ‘cisness’ is unnatural, ‘sex isn’t real’ in new book. I

1 Share

SCIENCE: Penn professor claims ‘cisness’ is unnatural, ‘sex isn’t real’ in new book.

If you think sex isn’t real, you’re doing it wrong.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

HOOKERS AND BLOW AIN’T CHEAP, FOLKS: From Influence Peddler to Starving Artist: Hunter Biden Claims

1 Share

HOOKERS AND BLOW AIN’T CHEAP, FOLKS: From Influence Peddler to Starving Artist: Hunter Biden Claims Family is Broke in Defaulting on $17 Million Bill.

In a deposition in ongoing litigation with the law firm Winston Taylor, Hunter claimed an inability to pay the $17 million he owes his lawyers for representing him in criminal prosecutions, congressional investigations, and civil lawsuits.

Hunter claimed under oath that “I don’t own anything of any value other than — and I don’t know the value of it — my paintings which I painted myself. So that’s it. And I don’t even have any other assets at all, stocks, bonds, anything like that, savings accounts.” He also added, “My family doesn’t have any money, and it’s not their debt anyway.”

The statement about his family is curious, since Joe and Jill Biden recently received numerous book contracts and were thought to be worth millions. However, the Wall Street Journal recently reported that Joe Biden is struggling with $800,000 in debt and, ironically, increased property taxes in his blue state of Delaware on his $2.7 million home. (Moving to Florida like many fleeing blue state taxes is not a viable option for the Bidens).

Worse yet, no one wants Biden to do speeches and appearances, cutting off a lucrative post-presidency income. Not only is Biden obviously diminished in his ability to give a speech, but many Democrats blame him for the reelection of Trump by clinging to power despite his obvious deteriorating mental and physical condition.

That’s a sad state of affairs for Joe Biden, but it’s also an accurate reflection of what his cabal did to the nation.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

THE LEFT IS NOT ONLY MORE ABSURD THAN YOU IMAGINE, IT IS MORE ABSURD THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE: https:

1 Share

THE LEFT IS NOT ONLY MORE ABSURD THAN YOU IMAGINE, IT IS MORE ABSURD THAN YOU CAN IMAGINE:

Kafka today reads like a news report, back when you could still trust news reports.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Don't Hate the Dodgers for Dominating So Much, Hate the Bankruptcy Court That Helped Them Do It

1 Share
Tarik Skubal wearing a blue Dodgers hat in a baseball dugout. His lips are pursed. | Photo: Javier Rojas/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom

Hello and welcome to another edition of Free Agent! Make some smart financial moves this week.

Apologies if today's photo also made you physically ill. But I'm not here to coddle you. We'll talk about MLB and the Los Angeles Dodgers, followed by a quick hit on FIFA President Gianni Infantino's dumbest move yet. We'll close with a quick review of a new pickleball movie.

Locker Room Links

Don't Hate the Dodgers, Hate the Court

The two-time defending champion Dodgers have done it again. Whenever there is a big fish on the trade or free agent market, where do they almost always end up? Dodger Stadium.

Tarik Skubal—who was raised and molded by my Detroit Tigers from a ninth-round draft pick into an unstoppable machine—is the latest Dodgers acquisition. The Dodgers were already a massive World Series favorite, again, but after the trade they surged to a 40 percent chance of winning it all, per Polymarket. (Granted, that still gives anyone else in baseball a 60 percent chance.)

Baseball fans are tired of it (even if last year's World Series was absolute cinema). Imagine the wailing and lamentations if the Dodgers do it again. Perhaps public opinion doesn't matter much, but sentiment would very much be on the side of the owners pushing for a salary cap in an attempt at competitive balance.

How did the Dodgers get here? It's not just the money. As the 47–66 Mets are more than unhappy to show us, having the top payroll in baseball doesn't guarantee anything. Willingness to give up their prospects, not money, is why Skubal ended up in L.A. instead of with someone else. As I wrote last fall, "the Dodgers won again by spending their money and managing their players more wisely than everyone else." But there's a lot more money to burn when your team has a court-ordered agreement in place that shields your money from the MLB's revenue-sharing agreements.

It may be hard to remember now amid 13 straight playoff seasons, but the Dodgers weren't always this good or well-managed. They missed the playoffs in most of my formative years (the '90s and 2000s). In 2011, they were basically out of money, and owner Frank McCourt's divorce wasn't helping. A judge invalidated an agreement that McCourt claimed gave him sole ownership of the team, and then MLB Commissioner Bud Selig threw out a 17-year local TV contract worth between roughly $2 billion and $3 billion total because it seemed too advantageous to the Dodgers. In bankruptcy court, everyone had to make up a placeholder number for what the team's next TV deal would be worth for MLB revenue-sharing purposes. Everyone in court agreed on $84 million a year (which seems absurdly low since the deal Selig threw out was worth roughly twice as much).

In reality, the ongoing TV deal is worth an average of $334 million a year, and lasts until 2038. So the Dodgers get $334 million a year from their local TV deal, but MLB's revenue-sharing rules were forced to pretend the Dodgers only got $84 million a year (the Dodgers owners decided to increase this to $130 million, with some modest annual increases, because even they realized how good a deal this was—but MLB has no power to simply change the Dodgers number on its own). It's basically a huge annual windfall for the Dodgers, more than enough to cover the salaries of a few star players with some help from deferred money. (All the numbers in this paragraph are estimates from various media sources, with some saying the Dodgers are saving about $50 million to $55 million this year, some saying it's $66 million, and others saying more.)

That brings MLB to the current labor impasse. Everyone is trying to fix this imbalance but doesn't agree on how. The owners want a salary cap so that it doesn't matter how much money the Dodgers or anyone else is getting, because each team wouldn't be allowed to spend above a certain amount on payroll (granted, this also keeps the owners' labor costs down). The players union wants a larger portion of TV money to get pooled in a way that would allow teams with smaller local TV contracts to keep more of their money than the big teams.

Dodgers fans are also free to argue against the concepts of salary caps, luxury taxes, and revenue sharing all they want—but it doesn't mean their team should get to benefit from a special deal. These days they basically print money anyway thanks to huge sponsorships and merchandising revenue and would probably still be able to outspend everyone else.

Sports fans will find any reason to hate on a team that's dominating the league and signing players at their own fans' expense. I don't begrudge the Dodgers for being so good at baseball and business—again, money certainly isn't the biggest reason why Skubal got sent to the Dodgers (that would be an idiotic front office that quit on a good team). But it's fair for baseball fans to be mad that the Dodgers were run into the ground financially and then lucked their way into a financial deal in bankruptcy court that is shaping MLB for a quarter-century.

What Was Gianni Infantino Thinking?

For a guy who managed to get elected as FIFA president, and who managed to navigate a World Cup under U.S. President Donald Trump, it sure seems like Gianni Infantino doesn't know a lot about politics, even within his own organization.

A lot was riding on the 2026 World Cup, and it came away as, by far, FIFA's most commercially successful event. That's when Infantino thought it'd be a good idea to double down—by spinning FIFA's commercial side into a subsidiary, with 20 percent of that subsidiary sold to investors outside of FIFA's member organizations. Infantino even had the deal all lined up; he just needed approval from enough FIFA members.

The investing firm to be involved was linked to Thrive Capital, founded by Joshua Kushner (Trump's son-in-law's brother). Critics said Infantino was selling soccer off to private equity, but Thrive Capital is actually a venture capital firm (not that it makes much difference to those critics).

In any case, less than a week after the plan was unveiled, Infantino withdrew the plan due to backlash. His FIFA presidency suddenly seems to be in jeopardy.

FIFA, like every other sporting entity, has every right to work with investors to maximize its profits. But this was bad internal politics. Threatening members with a sudden ultimatum (get on board or get your funding cut) was never going to go down well. The optics of investors getting involved in the World Cup was never going to go down well. The Kushner name—even if this Kushner apparently isn't actually well-connected to Trump—was never going to go down well. Reports that Infantino was hoping for a $24 million raise were never going to go down well.

As I wrote back in December, if FIFA doesn't want people to think it's corrupt, it should stop doing things that look corrupt.

Dink It Up

Once upon a time my wife and I were regulars of a pickleball league. Unfortunately, I haven't played in awhile, but you don't need to play pickleball to enjoy Apple TV's new movie The Dink. My wife and I are huge Jake Johnson fans, so there was no way we were going to miss this.

The plot, to be fair, is kind of annoying—an exaggerated tennis vs. pickleball, good vs. evil, father vs. son tale. (A romantic subplot involving a large age gap is even more annoying.) But the jokes land very well, and there are good laughs to be had throughout. Aaron Chen does great as the suck-up sidekick. Andy Roddick shows up and holds his own. I would have guessed Ben Stiller had better things to do, but as a producer he might as well show up in a couple scenes, and he had one of the funniest bits in the film.

The Dink could have been better, and could have been worse, but I recommend it as a good way to spend an hour and 42 minutes. When you're done, you should read an award-winning Reason magazine article about pickleball that will not take you nearly as long to get through.

Replay of the Week

Professional women's baseball is back—and I regret to inform you the Los Angeles team is doing well there, too.

That's all for this week. Enjoy watching the real game of the week on Friday, when the San Francisco Firebells play the Los Angeles Queens in the Women's Pro Baseball League.

The post Don't Hate the Dodgers for Dominating So Much, Hate the Bankruptcy Court That Helped Them Do It appeared first on Reason.com.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
4 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories