
“A King Would Not Allow a Protest called ‘No Kings.'”
Correct. And here are things a King WOULD do:
Intimidate social media companies into not posting items the government dislikes;
Attempt to disarm the noncriminal population;
Force productive citizens to support the livelihood of nonproductive noncitizens;
Forcibly mask and vaccinate the population for the flu–while forcing the same citizens to work to pay for the “free” vaccines while absolving the manufacturers of all liability;
Open the borders and ship illegals (often violent criminals) into states that do not support the King;
Arrest the former and future President for no reason and then charge him with crimes not on the books that he didn’t commit;
Fix elections and threaten to imprison you when you challenge the unorthodox or brazenly illegal activities of election officials.
Need I continue? It seems to me we have already had a King.
The post No Kings — Say the Kings appeared first on Michael J. Hurd, Ph.D. | Living Resources Center.
News today got me thinking about a quote from T.E Utley’s Lessons of Ulster which was first published in 1975. Below is a scan from my copy.
For the uninitiated he is referring to the creation of a “no go” zone in Londonderry which lasted from 1969 to 1972.
Lessons of Ulster is a magnificent work. Flicking through it 30 years after having read it I was surprised how perceptive he was – more perceptive that I recall thinking at the time. But as you can see from the marginalia, I didn’t entirely agree with Utley and after hearing the news that the threat of Islamic violence has led to Israeli football fans being banned from attending a match in Birmingham I think I can claim that I was right and Utley wrong. Sure, we may not be seeing barricades but there can be little doubt that the British state lacks the will to face down mob violence.
Lest I am doing Utley a disservice, he did also have this to say:
It… seemed to me that, in some degree at least, the tragic conflict in Ulster might turn out to be a rehearsal for an even more devastating challenge to authority on this side of the Irish Sea.
Although – given that this was written in the 1970s – I think he was probably thinking more about communists and trade unions.
Update: Link fixed.
… is from page 7 of the late William Riker’s 1982 book, Liberalism Against Populism :
No government that has eliminated economic freedom has been able to attain or keep democracy, probably because, when all economic life is absorbed into government, there is no conceivable financial base for opposition. But economic liberty is also an end in itself because capitalism is the driving force for the increased efficiency and technological innovation that has produced in two centuries both a vast increase in the wealth of capitalist nations and a doubling of the average life span of their citizens.
The post Quotation of the Day… appeared first on Cafe Hayek.