70635 stories
·
2 followers

Did Elvis Costello Go Woke Over ‘Oliver’s Army’ Slur?

1 Share

Elvis Costello once uttered a terrible word, twice, during a drunken exchange that might have gotten him canceled today.

Perhaps permanently.

The singer-songwriter slammed American music in general and, more specifically, U.S.-based superstars Ray Charles and James Brown with the dreaded “n-word,” according to a 2010 New Yorker profile of the rock icon. As the story goes, Costello got knocked to the floor in short order, and the incident allegedly hurt his rising star status. (Costello publicly apologized for the outburst)

Ask Morgan Wallen how that feels.

More than 40 years later, Costello is still a vibrant touring act, but he recently changed the words to one of his iconic songs – “Oliver’s Army.” 

YouTube Video

Now, the singer is swearing – literally – that he didn’t go woke in the process. Costello nixed the song from his concert lineup in 2022, but he wasn’t forthcoming as to the reason why.

RELATED: ELVIS COSTELLO SLAMS TRUMP, FALLS OUT OF TUNE

“Oliver’s Army” is back, but it’s had a minor facelift.

The old lyric: “Only takes one itchy trigger, One more widow, one less white n-word”

The new lyric: Only takes one itchy trigger, One more widow, one less pallbearer”

(NOTE: The closed captioning on the YouTube version of the song includes the word in question)

The song in question finds Costello weighing in on “The Troubles,” the ongoing Northern Ireland feud that left hundreds dead and many more injured.

The line in question, according to LouderSound.com, “is a reference to a slur used against Irish Catholics and to racist attitudes which underpinned British military campaigns across the world in centuries past, and which permeates sections of the British Army to this day.”

The musician shared his explanation for the lyric on a 2002 reissue of “Armed Forces,” the album featuring the track.

“I made my first trip to Belfast in 1978 and saw mere boys walking around in battle dress with automatic weapons. They were no longer just on the evening news. These snapshot experiences exploded into visions of mercenaries and imperial armies around the world. The song was based on the premise ‘they always get a working class boy to do the killing’.”

The slur doesn’t connect to what we typically imagine when that reprehensible term comes to mind. Still, Costello changed it anyway.

His explanation will sound to some like an excuse.

“I no longer use words that go off like alarm clocks, because indignation about that word stops people hearing what the song is about,” he explains.”That is my position. People went, ‘That’s woke.’ Well, go f*** yourself.”

The Rolling Stones faced a similar issue in recent years. The band favorite “Brown Sugar” got the heave-ho in 2021 for allegedly demeaning black women and slavery references.

Guitarist Keith Richards defended the song but didn’t fight to keep it on the band’s live playlist, apparently.

“I’m trying to figure out with the sisters quite where the beef is. Didn’t they understand this was a song about the horrors of slavery? But they’re trying to bury it. At the moment I don’t want to get into conflicts with all of this s***,” he said. “But I’m hoping that we’ll be able to resurrect the babe in her glory somewhere along the track.”

Classic rockers once trashed hotel rooms and committed other unspeakable acts. Now, they dare not offend fans both old and new.

Did Costello have a moment of woke? Or is his anger at the suggestion justified?

The post Did Elvis Costello Go Woke Over ‘Oliver’s Army’ Slur? appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
3 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

Henry Nowak and the Selective Morality of the Left

1 Share

Marian Halcombe, “Henry Nowak and the Selective Morality of the Left,”  Libertarian Alliance (UK) (7 June, 2026)

Related

Henry Nowak and the Selective Morality of the Left

The death of Henry Nowak was a terrible crime. A young man was stabbed to death. The police response appears to have been grossly inadequate. His killer, Vickrum Digwa, was arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Nothing that follows should obscure these facts. Nor should anything that follows diminish the grief of Henry Nowak’s family, whose dignity in bereavement has been evident throughout.

At the same time, there are events that refuse to remain private. They illuminate wider truths about the society in which they occur. They reveal assumptions and habits of thought that extend far beyond the immediate circumstances. The reaction to Henry Nowak’s death has become one of those events.

Particularly revealing has been the response of the left-wing blogging collective Sodium Haze. Their statement deserves careful attention, not because it is especially unusual, but because it is representative. It expresses with unusual clarity a habit of thought that has become hegemonic throughout much of the contemporary left.

They write:

The murder of Henry Nowak was a heinous act and the police involved after his stabbing behaved appallingly.

His murderer Vickrum Digwa was arrested, tried, convicted and jailed for life. Henry’s family must be devastated but had the grace to plead that their son’s death not be exploited to stoke racial hatred, it has been exploited anyway.

There are over 500 homicides in the UK annually, of which 81% of the suspects are white, but THIS murder fits the narrative of oppressed victimhood that the far right delights in stoking for their own ends, they don’t give a damn about Henry or his family they merely sense an opportunity.

That Nigel Farage seized the opportunity is no surprise, he has no morals and cared not about the pain nor wishes of the victims family either. Farage wants a Trumpian world divided along lines of ethno-religious hatred for in such a world (and only that kind of world) he can gather power to himself.

We can expect the rest of the mainstream political / media complex to jostle for what political advantage they can scratch from this tragedy, they don’t seem to care where these dangerous dynamics can lead, or perhaps they are counting on them.

The argument deserves a serious response. Not because it is persuasive, but because it reveals so much about how large parts of the modern left now understand morality, politics, and race.

The first thing to notice is that the Sodium Haze writers are not obviously bad people. Indeed, I have often found myself agreeing with them. Their opposition to aggressive war is admirable. Their hostility to the Gaza holocaust is admirable. They appear genuinely disturbed by mass killing and by the abuse of power. This makes their reaction to the Nowak case all the more interesting.

Read more>>

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
3 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

"Why Can't California Count?"

1 Share

Eli McKown-Dawson (Silver Bulletin) writes (introduced by Nate Silver):

California is notoriously slow at counting its ballots. In 2024, it took California until November 8 (three days after Election Day) to get just 70 percent of its ballots counted. Across all 50 states, the average share of the vote counted by that date was more than 95 percent, putting California squarely in last place. Rest assured, The Golden State did eventually hit that 95 percent mark … a full 10 days later….

Florida now manages to count 99 percent of its ballots within a few hours of polls closing, in part because election officials can process ballots before the polls close. And they are able to accomplish this feat of incredible speed with a sizable proportion of mail votes — about 27 percent in 2024…. Colombia held a presidential election on Sunday, and 99.98 percent of the result was in on Monday morning. Japan also counts most of its votes overnight. And in the UK (not exactly a poster child for state capacity), you can generally expect to have calls for all 650 parliamentary seats the morning after the election….

Nor is the problem inherent in California's choice to promote mail voting:

Mail-voting states such as Oregon, Washington, and Colorado count slowly relative to the US average, but they're all faster than California…. [And y]ou can make voting accessible without bending over backward to accommodate the tiny share of people affected by extending the mail ballot receipt deadline [to one week after the election, as California has]….

And slowness doesn't seem to be the price one needs to pay for accuracy:

There's no evidence that voter fraud or other election administration issues are any less prevalent in California than in faster counting states. Based on the Elections Performance Index — a project that compares election administration quality across states — California ranked 41st in 2024. So the state isn't slower and better: it's slower and (often) worse….

If you want people to be confident in your electoral system, a good first step is to build one that works properly instead of adding yet another example to the "California is a failed state" pile.

The post "Why Can't California Count?" appeared first on Reason.com.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

CBS News' Shakeup and the Future of the Mainstream Press

1 Share


Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

R-Rated ‘Scary Movie’ Trounces Family-Friendly ‘Breadwinner’

1 Share

Woke killed the R-rated comedy.

It’s hard to deny. It’s even more challenging to bring them back, en masse, to movie theaters.

The recent “No Hard Feelings” was a good first effort, drawing a modest crowd and delivering a few adult laughs. The recent “Busboys,” released with zero fanfare, pushed the envelope but quickly disappeared from theaters.

YouTube Video

Others, like “Ricky Stanicky” and “Balls Up” debuted on Prime Video, not in theaters. The former found some R-rated laughs while the latter proved unwatchable. (Full disclosure: This critic watched the first 25 minutes of “Balls Up” but bailed at that point – so not a full-throated review)

Now, we have our first R-rated comedy smash in a while, courtesy of the Wayans family.

Scary Movie,” the sixth film in the parody franchise, is set to make an estimated $56 million this weekend in a very crowded, competitive marketplace. That’s gold, especially since the film’s budget came in around $30 million.

That’s just math.

Now, compare that to the reception for “The Breadwinner.” The squeaky-clean comedy gives Nate Bargatze his first major film role. He’s the most popular stand-up comedian in the country by a large margin.

Yet the film opened to a tepid $7+ million in its opening frame, and it’s expected to fall roughly 59 percent this weekend.

“The Breadwinner” will likely crush it on VOD and, later, a streaming service. The comic’s first film simply didn’t lure his legion of fans to theaters.

Audiences chose an R-rated comedy that vowed to offend and cross every line. The latter was literally in the film’s marketing materials.

We’ll need more data to draw more conclusions from this box office information, but it suggests we’re eager to see more bawdy comedies at our local cineplex.

Could “The Hangover: Part IV” be next?

Do you long for the return of R-rated comedies in theaters? Which ones are your personal favorites?

The post R-Rated ‘Scary Movie’ Trounces Family-Friendly ‘Breadwinner’ appeared first on Hollywood in Toto.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

TDS Watch: The 'Convicted Felon' Argument

1 Share


Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
2 days ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories