12130 stories
·
2 followers

Comic for November 18, 2018

1 Share
Dilbert readers - Please visit Dilbert.com to read this feature. Due to changes with our feeds, we are now making this RSS feed a link to Dilbert.com.
Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
12 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

ALL OUR TREES ARE CATCHING FIRE! HEY, MAYBE YOU SHOULD CUT SOME OF THEM DOWN. Facing Deadlier Fir…

1 Share

ALL OUR TREES ARE CATCHING FIRE! HEY, MAYBE YOU SHOULD CUT SOME OF THEM DOWN. Facing Deadlier Fires, California Tries Something New: More Logging: Environmentalists and the timber industry, after long butting heads, increasingly agree that cutting trees to thin forests is vital to reducing fire danger. “Another dangerous factor, land-management experts say, is that forests have become overgrown with trees and underbrush due to a mix of human influences, including a past federal policy of putting out fires, rather than letting them burn. Washington has also sharply reduced logging under pressure from environmentalists.”

Weird, I remember a lot of people dunking on Trump after he said this the other day.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
16 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

K-12 IMPLOSION UPDATE: There Are No ‘Good’ Public Schools….

1 Share

K-12 IMPLOSION UPDATE: There Are No ‘Good’ Public Schools.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
16 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

JOURNALISM: NYT, CNN wildly skew story on sexual harassment, Pence’s Press Secretary busts them. …

1 Share

JOURNALISM: NYT, CNN wildly skew story on sexual harassment, Pence’s Press Secretary busts them.

She certainly did:

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
16 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

SCOTUS to look at testimony involving census citizenship question

1 Share

When it was first announced that the government would be expanding the practice of asking a question about citizenship to all census forms in 2020 (rather than just the long forms where it’s already asked), open borders proponents were outraged. A flurry of lawsuits from blue states followed which have been tied up in the courts since that time. An answer to one aspect of a contested issue involving this question may be coming our way soon, as the Supreme Court agreed yesterday to hear a challenge from a case in New York where the court is attempting to depose Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross over how the decision to add the question was made. (Washington Post)

The Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments Friday over whether Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross can be compelled to testify in a case regarding the Trump administration’s addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 decennial census.

The addition of the question, which opponents say is a political move that will make the census less accurate and more costly, has been challenged in six lawsuits around the country. In New York, a trial is underway in federal court over a multistate lawsuit attempting to block the question.

In that case, U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman made a preliminary finding that there was evidence the Trump administration acted in bad faith, moving forward the lawsuit, led by New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, and allowing for Ross to be deposed.

Why anyone was trying to depose Ross in the first place remains something of a mystery, at least to me. As mentioned above, this question is already asked on the long census form and nobody seemed to object to it before. The plaintiffs are arguing that there was some sort of “bad faith” aspect to the decision, but if the government wants to ask the question of everyone rather than a smaller segment of the population, how is that any different or somehow an act of bad faith?

What the blue state Attorneys General are actually upset about (aside from a kneejerk desire to thwart the Trump administration in any way they can), is that asking illegal aliens their citizenship status may prompt them to not fill out the form. This is also a tough position to defend. It’s a legal requirement for everyone to answer the census questions (see U.S. Code, Title 13, Chapter 7) though you can only be fined $100 for not answering or $500 for giving a false answer. The law also specifically states the only thing you can’t be asked and that’s information relating to any religious affiliations you may or may not have.

In the case of illegal aliens, if more of them are refusing to return their census forms (assuming they can be located to give them one), bothering with a $100 fine seems rather silly. If you can locate them to charge them with this relatively minor crime, you may as well just detain and deport them, making their contribution to the census irrelevant. Conversely, if the government needs that information to properly enforce the Voting Rights Act, it would seem to be the more pressing need in this case. Hopefully, the Supremes can sort this out for us in time for the forms to be printed.

The post SCOTUS to look at testimony involving census citizenship question appeared first on Hot Air.



Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
18 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

ENDORSED: To Fix Elections, Hold Real Elections. Day and date. No provisionals, no early voting, no…

1 Share

ENDORSED: To Fix Elections, Hold Real Elections. Day and date. No provisionals, no early voting, no mail-ins, no absentees. Just vote.

Read the whole story
gangsterofboats
19 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories